|
|
The geometry used in the ground plane patterns of the Royston garden, if rectilinear, is typically irregular and asymmetrical. The 1947 Chinn Garden is a fine example of this. Royston often employed non-rectilinear arrangements in his gardens, including triangles, trapezoids, and parallelograms. Completely free form, biomorphic shapes as well as circular forms can also be found as organizing elements for the ground plane in his post war gardens. Royston used a variety of techniques to achieve strong and legible ground plane patterns. The hardscape elements in these gardens; terraces, patios, pathways, and decks, were often the starting point for designed patterns. The shapes and relationships of these elements often set up the basic form for the garden. Additional complexity was achieved through the use of score joints, headers, surface textures, and contrasting colors. Further definition of the ground plane was also achieved by extruding patterns up from the ground plane in the form of planters or seat walls. It is interesting to note that some of the ideas that Royston initially explored at a residential scale would later find their way into larger projects.
The shape and placement of planting areas were also integral elements used to generate the ground plane patterns that are characteristic of Robert Royston's post war design work. Lawn panels, an almost mandatory feature in the emerging suburban context of the period, were shaped to complement the patterns established by hardscape elements. Groundcover plantings were also arranged to emphasize and expand patterning. Unless dictated by the edges of hardscape elements, the planting areas in these post war gardens were almost always free form in shape.
|
|
